Hithis is a fantastic module. I’m trying to use under a Joomla project. I’m not using all of the itens, just 4 icons on the dock and i’ve positioned on the header but i’ve been looking for an another position, aligned on the right of the header but i couldn’t do it. I’ve tried to do the positioning on CSS but it’s not working.You guys know how to do it??I supposed that the positioning is determined by jquery but i simply couldn’t understand the code. I’ve just found that is a inline CSS with left atribute.Anyone can help me please?
![]()
There are occasions in which printers that are connected to Mac computers do not have the ability to convert to postscript files in a way that can be 'read' to print by the printer. Some drivers do not have the ability to rasterize the PDF file. Luckily, there is an easy fix. You can simply print the file from Acrobat or Preview.
Hi guys, i absolutely love this menu, but i can’t get it to work with the latest jQuery?Is anyone else experiencing this?You can see from my site (under construction) that it’s not quite working. If I simply move the include script tag for the interface.js below the jquery.js then it works but subsequently stops anything that’s referencing the jQuery.jsI’m expecting anyone to fix this for me but if you have experienced the same problem i’d love to hear your solution.Once again, LOVE this menu style. It’s really very nice work. TKS alotBut I can’t get around two major problems 1.the interface script interferes with other jquery.js files and causes malfunction of other jquery depending scripts2. The bottom dock only stays on the bottom in a “non”scrollable page. The moment a page is longer than the screen and you scroll the page down. The dock would not move with the scroll (meaning it would not stay at the bottom edge of the screen) but would move into the screen and up the screen as you scroll further down.Cheers.
![]()
I made use of this beautiful mac-like dock in my application. Initially, I tried to place the dock fixed at the bottom of the page. But, the dock behaved anomalously in IE(always at top) as anticipated. Hence, I made use of a fixed position jQuery plug-in in order to achieve this functionality. The fisheye works fine when the page is scrolled down to the maximum extent, otherwise the fisheye doesn’t work. Even I applied the fisheye patch but it was futile.
Any insights on how to accomplish this?.
OK, so it looks like at least some browsers give an empty string type, and thus per spec an empty-string Content-Type. That lands us in step 7 of:Otherwise, the document's type is such that the resource will not affect browsingContext, e.g., because the resource is to be handed to an external application or because it is an unknown type that will be processed as a download. Process the resource appropriately.So it seems the spec is kind of assuming that empty-string content-type files should be downloaded. I'm not sure that's accurate in all browsers, but that at least seems to align with your Safari test results; maybe someone should also set up a standalone page that serves itself with a Content-Type: header and see what happens. Seems to me like this should be a response with Content-Type:as currently written in the specs linked, because the type for a Blob with no type provided is '.So then we land in and go off to which is not really written on top of the fetch concept of Responses so it's hard to tell what's going on here. But if we assume that step 4 applies, we get an empty supplied-type, which is not a 'parsable MIME type' and hence we use undefined as the supplied type.So then we're back in (which got called by which is called by step 4; note that this is before the step 7 quoted above). This says to dowith the sniff-scriptable flag equal to the inverse of the no-sniff flagand what that does really depends on what the sniff-scriptable flag is set to.
If that flag is set to true, then anything starting with '.One of the subtests in basic-popup-and-iframe-tests.https.js checks that window.isSecureContext returnsthe correct result with respect to an iframe that loads a Blob URL. The Blob URL is constructed from rawdata and does not have a type.
Every browser vender currently does something different when loadingsuch a Blob URL in an iframe and there is an on-going discussion on whether an agreement can be made.See for more details. The File API and Fetch standardsexplicitly describe how to handle loading a Blob URL with a type in an iframe. As the purpose of thistest is to ensure conformance with the Secure Context spec, it seems sufficient to update the testto construct the Blob URL with type 'text/html' and avoid at this time. One of the subtests in basic-popup-and-iframe-tests.https.js checks that window.isSecureContext returnsthe correct result with respect to an iframe that loads a Blob URL. The Blob URL is constructed from rawdata and does not have a type. Every browser vender currently does something different when loadingsuch a Blob URL in an iframe and there is an on-going discussion on whether an agreement can be made.See for more details. The File API and Fetch standardsexplicitly describe how to handle loading a Blob URL with a type in an iframe.
As the purpose of thistest is to ensure conformance with the Secure Context spec, it seems sufficient to update the testto construct the Blob URL with type 'text/html' and avoidat this time.
![]() Comments are closed.
|
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
January 2023
Categories |